Are Indian Startups Technology Driven ? Investigating Potentiality of Indian Startups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/amcije/2020/v3i2-3/153296Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights
, Potential, Startups, Technology.Paper Submission Date
, April 15, 2020, Paper Sent Back for Revision, May 10, Paper Acceptance Date, May 14, 2020.Abstract
The aspect which hinders technology driven entrepreneurship is weak intellectual property rights (IPR) protection. India was ranked second from bottom among 30 countries examined for IPR protection as per the 2015 GIPC Index of the US Chamber of Commerce. Weak IPR laws and enforcement continue to limit the ability of businesses to invest in R&D. Inadequate IPR protection could also discourage multinationals from setting up operations in India or in bringing their technology into the country. To foster innovation in terms of technology, both home-grown and imported, and to attract international partners who bring technology and global best practices, a country must have in place robust institutional and legal mechanisms to protect IPR. This needs to be prioritized by the Indian government as part of its national growth agenda to promote technology driven entrepreneurship.
To boost the startup enterprises in India along with market driven entrepreneurship, technology driven entrepreneurship has to be developed. Here in this paper an attempt was made to sincerely study startups from a technology point of view and not from the market point of view.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Cohen, S. (2013). What do accelerators do? Insights fromincubators and angels. Innovations,8(3/4), 19–25. https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/INOV_a_00184
Friederici, N. (2019). Hope and hype in Africa’s digital economy: The rise of innovation hubs. In M. Graham (Ed.), Digital Economies at Global Margins (pp. 193–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, IDRC
U.S. Chamber of Commerce. (2015). 2015 GIPC International IP Index Fact Sheet. https://www.uschamber.com/issue-brief/2015-gipc-international-ip-index-fact-sheet
Kohler, T. (2016). Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups. Business Horizons, 59(3), 347–357.
Krahmer, H. (2014). India’s lawless war on intellectual property. Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304679404579456672440016300
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling throughâ€. Public Administration Review,19(2), 79–88. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/973677
Newbert, S., Walsh, S., Kirchhoff, B., & Chavez, V. (2006). “Technology-driven entrepreneurship: Muddling through and succeeding with the second product,†. In Habbershon, Timothy G., Minniti, Maria, Rice, Mark P., Spinelli, Stephen, Zacharakis, Andrew (Eds), Entrepreneurship: The engine of growth (pp. 291–312). New York: Praeger Perspectives.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259271
Thomke, S. H. (1998). Managing experimentationin the design of new products. Management Science, 44(6), 743–877. https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.6.743
Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging with startups to enhance corporate innovation. California Management Review, 57(2), 66–90. https://dx.doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.66