Sustainable Coffee Marketing:Challenges and the Way Forward
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i1/85745Keywords:
Sustainable Coffee
, Certification, Standards, Markets, Price PremiumsPaper Submission Date
, August 7, 2015, Paper sent back for Revision, December 8, Paper Acceptance Date, December 12, 2015.Abstract
This paper analyzed markets for sustainable coffee by taking into account five individual sustainable coffee initiatives, that is, 4C (Common Codes for Coffee Community), Utz, Rainforest Alliance (RFA), Fair-trade Labeling Organization (FLO), and Organic coffee. The sustainable coffee production experienced a phenomenal growth over the past decade. However, the volumes of sales represent only a minor portion of production. Less than 25% of sustainable coffee produced was 'actually sold' as sustainable, while the remaining was just sold as 'ordinary' conventional coffee, without receiving any extra market benefits. Among the individual coffee certification initiatives, 4C (Common Codes for Coffee Community) signaled a more serious over-supply in the global market, wherein only 6% of its overall sustainable production was actually sold as sustainable over 2008-12. During the same period, Utz coffee certification could sell 25%, Rainforest Alliance (RFA) could trade 50%, and organic certified coffee could sell 55% of its standard-compliant production as sustainable. The study revealed that global sustainable coffee market is characterized by massive 'over-supply'; demand being a major constraint. Underpinning this issue is the need for sustainable coffee market. The current market challenge is to stabilize mismatch between demand and supply for sustainable coffee. From a sustainable development perspective, this remains a serious matter of concern for policy makers, public institutions, and multi-stakeholders to engage in market-based control mechanism in constructing effective 'supply- management base' as a strategy for price-stabilization and to enhance further sustainable growth. At a micro level in India, coffee certification is still at an infancy stage, contributing to just 2% of total global sustainable production. The Indian Coffee Board and apex coffee organizations need to work in this direction to encourage both sustainable production and marketing, so as to assist growers in assessing preferential market benefits, besides supporting high quality 'Indian coffee' being traded at both the global and domestic levels.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
4C Association. (2013). Propagating a sustainable coffee community: Annual report 2013. Retrieved from www.4C-coffeeassociation.org.
Achoth, L. (2005). Report on surveys on coffee holdings and coffee market chain in India in relation to mould contamination in coffee. Bangalore : Coffee Board of India.
Coffee Board of India. (2013). Database on coffee. Retrieved from www.indiacoffee.org
Fair-Trade International. (2014). Fair-trade minimum price and fair-trade premium table. Retrieved from www.fairtrade.net
Fair-trade Labeling Organizations (FLO).(2012). Monitoring the scope and benefits of Fair-trade (4th edition). Retrieved from http://www.fairtrade.net/fileadmin
Fox, T. (2007). The coffee system: What standard, what means? Graduate School of International Relations, University of California, San Diego.
International Coffee Organization. (2013). Monthly coffee report (December).Retrieved from http://dev.ico.org/documents/cy2013-14
Kline, A. (2010). Sustainable coffee certifications: A comparison matrix. Retrieved from https://www.scaa.org/PDF/Sustainable%20Coffee%20Certifications%20Comparison%20Matrix%202010.pdf
Kushalappa, C.G., & Kushalappa, K.A. (1998). Ecological changes in high altitude forests of Kodagu, South India. Proceedings of the Inter-Divisional Seoul Conference, Seoul, Korea, pp. 91-97.
Liu, P. (2008). Value-adding standards in the North-American food market. Trade opportunities in certified products for developing countries. Rome : FAO.
Mercereau, D., & Vignault, C. (2008). Coffee value chain and geographical indications in India: Origin, reputation and marketing of Indian coffees. Retrieved from http://apps.ifpindia.org/ecrire/upload/eco_projects/mercier_vignault_2008.pdf
Neilson, J., & Pritchard, B. (2007). Green coffee: The contradictions of global sustainability initiatives from an Indian perspective. Development Policy Review, 25 (3), 311-331.
Ponte, S. (2004). Standards and sustainability in the coffee sector: a global value chain approach. Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and UNCTAD.
Potts, J., Lynch M., Wilkings, A., Huppe, G., Cunningham, M., & Voora, V. (2014). The state of sustainability initiatives review 2014 : Standards and the green economy. Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/pdf/2014/ssi_2014.pdf
Potts, J., Van deer Meer, J., & Daitchman, J. (2010). The state of sustainability initiatives review 2010: Sustainability and transparency. Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/pdf/2010/ssi_sustainability_review_2010.pdf
Rainforest-Alliance. (2013). About us. Retrieved from http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/about
Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & Von Hagen, O. (2011). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33 (5/6), 789-812.
Rice, P.D., & McLean, J. (1999). Sustainable coffee at the crossroads (White Paper). Washington, D.C., USA : Consumer's Choice Council.
Upendranath, C. (2012). Small growers and coffee marketing-issues and perspective from the field (Discussion Paper 15). Thiruvanathapuram : NRPPD, CDS.
Utz Certified. (2013). Bringing good practice to scale: Utz Annual Report, Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://www.utzcertified.org/annual report