Social Media and New Product Development : Mapping Knowledge Structures and Research Frontiers

Authors

  •   Sonica Rautela Associate Professor (Corresponding Author), Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Survey # 231, Near Lunkad Gold Coast, Viman Nagar, Pune - 411 014, Maharashtra ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2891-3819
  •   Sourav Mondal Assistant Professor, Indian Institute of Management Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-1520

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2026/v56/i8/176078

Keywords:

social media, new product development, bibliometric analysis, knowledge structures, research frontiers.
Publishing Chronology: Paper Submission Date : October 31, 2025 ; Paper sent back for Revision : June 20, 2026 ; Paper Acceptance Date : July 10, 2026 ; Paper Published Online : August 17, 2026.

Abstract

Purpose : The study aimed to uncover the domain of social media and new product development (NPD), map the knowledge landscape, and identify research frontiers.

Design/Methodology/Approach : Bibliometric analysis was conducted using 357 documents retrieved from the Scopus database. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol was leveraged to ensure a systematic and objective process for determining, screening, and incorporating pertinent studies in the study domain. VoSviewer, CiteSpace, and the Biblioshiny app of Bibliometrix were used to visualize and comprehend the bibliometric indicators and intellectual frameworks.

Findings : The study provided insights into the domain and identified three key conceptual clusters: Customer Co-creation and Social Media: Connecting the Dots, Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: The New Success Mantra, and Creativity and Innovation: Restructuring Human and Organizational Structures. The study also underlined the evolution of past literature and the study parameters.

Practical Implications : The study offered managers and policymakers insights into the literature on NPD. The key insights provided policymakers an avenue to critically evaluate social media and the extent of freedom and usage required for NPD.

Originality/Value : The study represented the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis that explored social media from the lens of NPD. It mapped the knowledge structures, delineated key themes emerging from the previous literature, and opened novel pathways for imminent research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

Rautela, S., & Mondal, S. (2026). Social Media and New Product Development : Mapping Knowledge Structures and Research Frontiers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 56(8), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2026/v56/i8/176078

Issue

Section

Articles

References

1) Ahuja, D., & Madan, P. (2022). Fifty years of research on Vedas: A bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(8), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i8/171526

2) Allen, T. J. (1984). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. The MIT Press.

3) Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). JAI Press.

4) Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.

5) Andrade-Valbuena, N. A., & Merigo, J. M. (2018). Outlining new product development research through bibliometrics: Analyzing journals, articles and researchers. Journal of Strategy and Management, 11(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-08-2017-0061

6) Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

7) Arora, P., Singh, A. B., Ahuja, V., & Kumar, R. (2025). Mapping trends and future directions in consumer engagement and loyalty : A comprehensive bibliometric and thematic analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2025/v55/i3/174831

8) Avileli, J. M., Baliga, V., Gil, M. T., & Rao, K. (2025). Mapping celebrity endorsements in the food Industry: A bibliometric study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 55(7), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2025/v55/i7/175199

9) Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

10) Bashir, N., Papamichail, K., & Malik, K. (2017). Use of social media applications for supporting new product development processes in multinational corporations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.028

11) Benckendorff, P., & Zehrer, A. (2013). A network analysis of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005

12) Benitez, J., Braojos, J., Pavlou, P., & Llorens, J. (2025). Impact of social media technologies on new product development performance: Theory and empirical evidence. European Journal of Information Systems, 34(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2023.2270462

13) Björk, J., & Magnusson, M. (2009). Where do good innovation ideas come from? Exploring the influence of network connectivity on innovation idea quality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00691.x

14) Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(03)00087-4

15) Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Jurić, B., & Ilić, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703

16) Burt, R. S. (1992). Structure holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1kz4h78

17) Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787

18) Burt, R. S. (2007). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199249145.001.0001

19) Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002

20) Chang, W., & Taylor, S. A. (2015). The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0057

21) Chanias, S., & Hess, T. (2016). How digital are we? Maturity models for the assessment of a company's status in the digital transformation. Management Report / Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik und Neue Medien, 2, 1–14. https://www.wim.bwl.uni-muenchen.de/download/epub/mreport_2016_2.pdf

22) Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

23) Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

24) Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm's critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1250374

25) Fang, E. (2008). Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 90–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30162301

26) Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00006-9

27) Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2011). Customer empowerment in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00778.x

28) Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392

29) Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1330191

30) Han, R., Brennecke, J., Borah, D., & Lam, H. K. (2025). The use of social media in different phases of the new product development process: A systematic literature review. R&D Management, 55(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12687

31) Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032

32) Hansen, M. T., & Løvås, B. (2004). How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 801–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.413

33) Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Løvås, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803922

34) Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375604

35) Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70. https://www.proquest.com/docview/227744334?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals

36) Jeong, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, J.-M. (2019). Social media mining for product planning: A product opportunity mining approach based on topic modeling and sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.09.009

37) Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. (2006). Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0156

38) Joshi, N. A., Joshi, M., & Trada, S. (2024). A bibliometric and thematic analysis of the 'Indian Journal of Marketing': A study of 13 years. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i4/173711

39) Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

40) Kapoor, K. K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y

41) Kargaran, S., Shahri, M. H., Ghorbani, Z., Saberi, A., Jamali, S. M., & Aleebrahim, N. (2024). Patterns of publications in social media-based co-creation: A bibliometric analysis. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(3), 578–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-09-2021-0222

42) Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

43) Koufteros, X. A., Cheng, T. C., & Lai, K.-H. (2007). “Black‐box” and “gray‐box” supplier integration in product development: Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 847–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.009

44) Kumar, S., Khan, A., Lochab, A., Gupta, V. P., & Arora, A. K. (2023). Boundaryless career: A bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(8), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i8/173063

45) Kumari, S. P., & Mohanty, M. (2024). Online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending: A systematic literature review using bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(7), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i7/173637

46) Leenders, R. T., van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(03)00005-5

47) Liu, R., & Kop, A. E. (2016). Does social media really help?: From customer involvement to new product success. International Journal of Online Marketing, 6(3), 15–33.

48) Ludhani, K. K., Kumar, S., & Panda, S. K. (2023). A bibliometric overview of 'Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management' between 2011 and 2021. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i1/172666

49) Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 1–12. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/embedded-knowledge-embodied-new-product/docview/227815490/se-2

50) Mahadevan, K., & Joshi, S. (2021). Trends in electronic word of mouth research: A bibliometric review and analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i4/158468

51) Mahajan, Y., & Gadekar, A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of buzz marketing: Research areas, concerns, and suggestions for advancement. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i2/157550

52) Makhija, R., Aggarwal, S., & Singh, Y. (2025). AI-driven hybrid learning for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 18(9), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i9/174842

53) Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002

54) Mustak, M., Salminen, J., Plé, L., & Wirtz, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 124, 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.044

55) Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373

56) Nambisan, S. (2002). Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. The Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 392–413. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4134386

57) Pienaar, C., Van der Lingen, E., & Preis, E. (2019). A framework for successful new product development. The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.7166/30-3-2239

58) Piller, F., Vossen, A., & Ihl, C. (2012). From social media to social product development: The impact of social media on co-creation of innovation. Die Unternehmung, 66(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.5771/0042-059x-2012-1-7

59) Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657354

60) Prahalad, C., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015

61) Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.

62) Rashid, Y., Waseem, A., Akbar, A. A., & Azam, F. (2019). Value co-creation and social media: A systematic literature review using citation and thematic analysis. European Business Review, 31(5), 761–784. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-05-2018-0106

63) Rautela, S. (2024). Open innovation and new product development: Major themes and research trajectories. Journal of Management History, 30(4), 686–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-09-2023-0098

64) Rautela, S., Singhal, T. K., & Sharma, S. (2024). Customer participation and NPD process effectiveness: The perspective of marketers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(10), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i10/174603

65) Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3556658

66) Roch, J., & Mosconi, E. (2016). The use of social media tools in the product life cycle phases: A systematic literature review. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1830–1839). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.232

67) Samek-Pres, K. (2021). Social media in creating enterprise innovation: A systematic literature review. European Research Studies Journal, 24(2), 813–829.

68) Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20046

69) Shu, C., Page, A. L., Gao, S., & Jiang, X. (2012). Managerial ties and firm innovation: Is knowledge creation a missing link? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00883.x

70) Shukla, D., & Singh, M. (2025). Charting the research terrain of artificial intelligence in human resource management: A bibliometric analysis and emerging research horizons. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 18(8), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i8/173901

71) Sindhwaani, D., Mohapatra, D. R., & Goyal, A. K. (2026). A bibliometric and thematic analysis of key performance indicators in agricultural supply chains. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 19(2), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2026/v19i2/175044

72) Singh, R., & Arora, N. (2025). The application of artificial intelligence in law: A bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 18(7), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2025/v18i7/174565

73) Singh, S., Dutta, S., & Sharma, D. (2024). Mapping the landscape of sustainability reporting: A bibliometric analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(11), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i11/174023

74) Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

75) Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148

76) Thordsen, T., & Bick, M. (2023). A decade of digital maturity models: Much ado about nothing? Information Systems and e-Business Management, 21(4), 947–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00656-w

77) Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/257085

78) Ubgade, P. N., & Joshi, S. (2022). A review of brand anthropomorphism: Analysis of trends and research. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(10), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i10/172408

79) Ubgade, P. N., & Joshi, S. (2024). Two decades of advertisement engagement: A bibliometric and network analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(9), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i9/174397

80) Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399

81) Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 37–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808

82) van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science, 108, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011

83) Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

84) von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2631761

85) von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal Für Betriebswirtschaft, 55(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8

86) von Hippel, E. (2007). The sources of innovation. In C. Boersch & R. Elschen (Eds.), Das Summa Summarum des Management (pp. 111–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_10

87) Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. Free Press.

88) White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119–186.

89) Xu, C., Ryan, S., Prybutok, V., & Wen, C. (2012). It is not for fun: An examination of social network site usage. Information & Management, 49(5), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.05.001

90) Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351